GHSA-79F3-6WM5-9QVC
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-17 18:32 – Updated: 2026-09-17 18:32In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
perf/x86/intel/uncore: Fix uncore_box ref/unref ordering
In uncore_event_cpu_online(), uncore_box_ref() was called before uncore_change_context(). uncore_box_ref() gates on box->cpu >= 0, but box->cpu is still -1 at that point because uncore_change_context() has not run yet. As a result, the box is never initialized on the first CPU to come online in a die, leaving it permanently uninitialized in the single-CPU-per-die case.
Thus, box->refcnt is one count below the true value, and in the CPU offline path, the box will be torn down on the second-to-last CPU.
In uncore_event_cpu_offline(), uncore_box_unref() was called after uncore_change_context(), so box->cpu is already -1 when the collector CPU goes offline, which prevents it from tearing down the box.
Fix by swapping the call order in both paths so that uncore_box_{ref,unref}() runs at the point where box->cpu reflects the correct context.
Move allocate_boxes() out of uncore_box_ref() to enable this reordering.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-93181"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-09-17T17:18:14Z",
"severity": null
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nperf/x86/intel/uncore: Fix uncore_box ref/unref ordering\n\nIn uncore_event_cpu_online(), uncore_box_ref() was called before\nuncore_change_context(). uncore_box_ref() gates on box-\u003ecpu \u003e= 0,\nbut box-\u003ecpu is still -1 at that point because uncore_change_context()\nhas not run yet. As a result, the box is never initialized on the\nfirst CPU to come online in a die, leaving it permanently\nuninitialized in the single-CPU-per-die case.\n\nThus, box-\u003erefcnt is one count below the true value, and in the CPU\noffline path, the box will be torn down on the second-to-last CPU.\n\nIn uncore_event_cpu_offline(), uncore_box_unref() was called after\nuncore_change_context(), so box-\u003ecpu is already -1 when the collector\nCPU goes offline, which prevents it from tearing down the box.\n\nFix by swapping the call order in both paths so that\nuncore_box_{ref,unref}() runs at the point where box-\u003ecpu reflects\nthe correct context.\n\nMove allocate_boxes() out of uncore_box_ref() to enable this\nreordering.",
"id": "GHSA-79f3-6wm5-9qvc",
"modified": "2026-09-17T18:32:13Z",
"published": "2026-09-17T18:32:13Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-93181"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/174f0582e38abe03b88e15f04bfe58490f88cb19"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/64aa1bb4017d598828c6d8cd718f43daf2a83375"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.