GHSA-7FF7-896H-MMFV
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 16:55 – Updated: 2022-05-24 16:55
VLAI?
Details
The EAP peer implementation in Espressif ESP-IDF 2.0.0 through 4.0.0 and ESP8266_NONOS_SDK 2.2.0 through 3.1.0 allows the installation of a zero Pairwise Master Key (PMK) after the completion of any EAP authentication method, which allows attackers in radio range to replay, decrypt, or spoof frames via a rogue access point.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2019-12587"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2019-09-04T12:15:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "The EAP peer implementation in Espressif ESP-IDF 2.0.0 through 4.0.0 and ESP8266_NONOS_SDK 2.2.0 through 3.1.0 allows the installation of a zero Pairwise Master Key (PMK) after the completion of any EAP authentication method, which allows attackers in radio range to replay, decrypt, or spoof frames via a rogue access point.",
"id": "GHSA-7ff7-896h-mmfv",
"modified": "2022-05-24T16:55:25Z",
"published": "2022-05-24T16:55:25Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-12587"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/Matheus-Garbelini/esp32_esp8266_attacks"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/espressif"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://matheus-garbelini.github.io/home/post/zero-pmk-installation"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…