ghsa-7g24-qg88-p43q
Vulnerability from github
Published
2023-10-25 18:32
Modified
2023-11-01 05:54
Summary
jose4j uses weak cryptographic algorithm
Details

jose4j before v0.9.3 allows attackers to set a low PBES2 iteration count of 1000 or less.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "Maven",
        "name": "org.bitbucket.b_c:jose4j"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "0.9.3"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2023-31582"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-327",
      "CWE-331"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2023-10-27T19:13:19Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2023-10-25T18:17:27Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "jose4j before v0.9.3 allows attackers to set a low PBES2 iteration count of 1000 or less.",
  "id": "GHSA-7g24-qg88-p43q",
  "modified": "2023-11-01T05:54:15Z",
  "published": "2023-10-25T18:32:21Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-31582"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://bitbucket.org/b_c/jose4j"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://bitbucket.org/b_c/jose4j/commits/1929fe3"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://bitbucket.org/b_c/jose4j/issues/203/insecure-support-of-setting-pbe-less-then"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/KANIXB/JWTIssues/blob/main/jose4j%20issue.md"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "jose4j uses weak cryptographic algorithm"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading...

Loading...

Loading...
  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.