GHSA-7GPG-MPJM-JM5F

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 05:32 – Updated: 2022-05-17 05:32
VLAI?
Details

Cisco Unified Communications Manager (CUCM) with software 6.x and 7.x before 7.1(5b)su5, 8.0 before 8.0(3a)su3, and 8.5 and 8.6 before 8.6(2a)su1 and Cisco Business Edition 3000 with software before 8.6.3 and 5000 and 6000 with software before 8.6(2a)su1 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device reload) via a crafted SCCP registration, aka Bug ID CSCtu73538.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2011-4486"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2012-03-01T01:55:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Cisco Unified Communications Manager (CUCM) with software 6.x and 7.x before 7.1(5b)su5, 8.0 before 8.0(3a)su3, and 8.5 and 8.6 before 8.6(2a)su1 and Cisco Business Edition 3000 with software before 8.6.3 and 5000 and 6000 with software before 8.6(2a)su1 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device reload) via a crafted SCCP registration, aka Bug ID CSCtu73538.",
  "id": "GHSA-7gpg-mpjm-jm5f",
  "modified": "2022-05-17T05:32:38Z",
  "published": "2022-05-17T05:32:38Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2011-4486"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20120229-cucm"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…