ghsa-7hjw-w33m-2jqc
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-02 06:10
Modified
2022-05-02 06:10
Details
Unspecified vulnerability in Cisco ASA 5500 Series Adaptive Security Appliance 7.0 before 7.0(8.10), 7.2 before 7.2(4.45), 8.0 before 8.0(5.2), 8.1 before 8.1(2.37), and 8.2 before 8.2(1.16); and Cisco PIX 500 Series Security Appliance; allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device reload) via malformed SIP messages, aka Bug ID CSCsy91157.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2010-0150" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2010-02-19T17:30:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "Unspecified vulnerability in Cisco ASA 5500 Series Adaptive Security Appliance 7.0 before 7.0(8.10), 7.2 before 7.2(4.45), 8.0 before 8.0(5.2), 8.1 before 8.1(2.37), and 8.2 before 8.2(1.16); and Cisco PIX 500 Series Security Appliance; allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (device reload) via malformed SIP messages, aka Bug ID CSCsy91157.", "id": "GHSA-7hjw-w33m-2jqc", "modified": "2022-05-02T06:10:31Z", "published": "2022-05-02T06:10:31Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2010-0150" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/56338" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://osvdb.org/62434" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/38618" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/38636" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/products_security_advisory09186a0080b1910c.shtml" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/38277" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1023612" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2010/0415" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.