GHSA-7JXH-36Q5-GCQV
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-09 18:01 – Updated: 2026-09-09 18:01Impact
A bug in containerd's CRI ExecSync implementation allows exec probes and lifecycle hooks with background child processes to keep containerd's stdio-drain goroutines indefinitely blocked. Because the I/O drain phase lacks a default timeout or context cancellation handling, repeated ExecSync invocations (like probes) that include long-lived background processes against a container can cause containerd to leak goroutines and host memory. Over time, this resource exhaustion can cause the containerd daemon to be terminated by the OOM killer, rendering containerd unavailable until it is restarted. This issue affects containerd on Linux systems running with the CRI plugin enabled. Users not using containerd's CRI implementation or not running containers on Linux are not affected.
Patches
This bug has been fixed in containerd 2.3.5, 2.2.8, 2.0.12, and 1.7.35. Users should update to these versions to resolve the issue.
Workarounds
Ensure exec probes and lifecycle hooks do not launch long-lived background child processes.
Credits
The containerd project would like to thank XlabAI Team of Tencent Xuanwu Lab (xlabai@tencent.com), including Guannan Wang, Zhanpeng Liu, Jiashuo Liang, and Guancheng Li, and @IamwhatIamSY who independently discovered and responsibly disclosed this issue in accordance with the containerd security policy.
For more information
If there are any questions or comments about this advisory:
- Open an issue in containerd
- Send an email to security@containerd.io
To report a security issue in containerd: * Report a new vulnerability * Send an email to security@containerd.io
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Go",
"name": "github.com/containerd/containerd/v2"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.0.12"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Go",
"name": "github.com/containerd/containerd"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "1.7.35"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Go",
"name": "github.com/containerd/containerd/v2"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "2.2.0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.2.8"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Go",
"name": "github.com/containerd/containerd/v2"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "2.3.0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.3.5"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-53495"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-400"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-09-09T18:01:33Z",
"nvd_published_at": null,
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "### Impact\n\nA bug in containerd\u0027s CRI ExecSync implementation allows exec probes and lifecycle hooks with background child processes to keep containerd\u0027s stdio-drain goroutines indefinitely blocked. Because the I/O drain phase lacks a default timeout or context cancellation handling, repeated ExecSync invocations (like probes) that include long-lived background processes against a container can cause containerd to leak goroutines and host memory. Over time, this resource exhaustion can cause the containerd daemon to be terminated by the OOM killer, rendering containerd unavailable until it is restarted. This issue affects containerd on Linux systems running with the CRI plugin enabled. Users not using containerd\u0027s CRI implementation or not running containers on Linux are not affected.\n\n### Patches\n\nThis bug has been fixed in containerd 2.3.5, 2.2.8, 2.0.12, and 1.7.35. Users should update to these versions to resolve the issue.\n\n### Workarounds\n\nEnsure exec probes and lifecycle hooks do not launch long-lived background child processes.\n\n### Credits\n\nThe containerd project would like to thank XlabAI Team of Tencent Xuanwu Lab (xlabai@tencent.com), including Guannan Wang, Zhanpeng Liu, Jiashuo Liang, and Guancheng Li, and @IamwhatIamSY who independently discovered and responsibly disclosed this issue in accordance with the [containerd security policy](https://github.com/containerd/project/blob/main/SECURITY.md).\n\n### For more information\n\nIf there are any questions or comments about this advisory:\n\n* Open an issue in [containerd](https://github.com/containerd/containerd/issues/new/choose)\n* Send an email to [security@containerd.io](mailto:security@containerd.io)\n\nTo report a security issue in containerd:\n* [Report a new vulnerability](https://github.com/containerd/containerd/security/advisories/new)\n* Send an email to [security@containerd.io](mailto:security@containerd.io)",
"id": "GHSA-7jxh-36q5-gcqv",
"modified": "2026-09-09T18:01:33Z",
"published": "2026-09-09T18:01:33Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/containerd/containerd/security/advisories/GHSA-7jxh-36q5-gcqv"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/containerd/containerd"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/containerd/containerd/releases/tag/v1.7.35"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/containerd/containerd/releases/tag/v2.0.12"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/containerd/containerd/releases/tag/v2.2.8"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/containerd/containerd/releases/tag/v2.3.5"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "containerd: CRI ExecSync Goroutine Leak Leads to Node-Level Denial of Service"
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.