ghsa-7m4v-cwm7-4f2m
Vulnerability from github
Published
2024-07-04 15:30
Modified
2024-07-09 18:30
Severity ?
Details
Exim through 4.97.1 misparses a multiline RFC 2231 header filename, and thus remote attackers can bypass a $mime_filename extension-blocking protection mechanism, and potentially deliver executable attachments to the mailboxes of end users.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2024-39929" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2024-07-04T15:15:10Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "Exim through 4.97.1 misparses a multiline RFC 2231 header filename, and thus remote attackers can bypass a $mime_filename extension-blocking protection mechanism, and potentially deliver executable attachments to the mailboxes of end users.", "id": "GHSA-7m4v-cwm7-4f2m", "modified": "2024-07-09T18:30:43Z", "published": "2024-07-04T15:30:40Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-39929" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3099#c4" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.exim.org/exim.git/commit/1b3209b0577a9327ebb076f3b32b8a159c253f7b" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://git.exim.org/exim.git/commit/6ce5c70cff8989418e05d01fd2a57703007a6357" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/Exim/exim/compare/exim-4.98-RC2...exim-4.98-RC3" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2231.txt" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading...
Loading...
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.