ghsa-7m4v-cwm7-4f2m
Vulnerability from github
Published
2024-07-04 15:30
Modified
2024-07-09 18:30
Details

Exim through 4.97.1 misparses a multiline RFC 2231 header filename, and thus remote attackers can bypass a $mime_filename extension-blocking protection mechanism, and potentially deliver executable attachments to the mailboxes of end users.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2024-39929"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2024-07-04T15:15:10Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Exim through 4.97.1 misparses a multiline RFC 2231 header filename, and thus remote attackers can bypass a $mime_filename extension-blocking protection mechanism, and potentially deliver executable attachments to the mailboxes of end users.",
  "id": "GHSA-7m4v-cwm7-4f2m",
  "modified": "2024-07-09T18:30:43Z",
  "published": "2024-07-04T15:30:40Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-39929"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3099#c4"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.exim.org/exim.git/commit/1b3209b0577a9327ebb076f3b32b8a159c253f7b"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.exim.org/exim.git/commit/6ce5c70cff8989418e05d01fd2a57703007a6357"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/Exim/exim/compare/exim-4.98-RC2...exim-4.98-RC3"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2231.txt"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.