GHSA-7RW5-C532-37CV

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-08-10 00:30 – Updated: 2024-04-04 06:46
VLAI?
Details

Crypto wallets implementing the Lindell17 TSS protocol might allow an attacker to extract the full ECDSA private key by exfiltrating a single bit in every signature attempt (256 in total) because of not adhering to the paper's security proof's assumption regarding handling aborts after a failed signature.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2023-33242"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-74"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2023-08-09T22:15:11Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Crypto wallets implementing the Lindell17 TSS protocol might allow an attacker to extract the full ECDSA private key by exfiltrating a single bit in every signature attempt (256 in total) because of not adhering to the paper\u0027s security proof\u0027s assumption regarding handling aborts after a failed signature.",
  "id": "GHSA-7rw5-c532-37cv",
  "modified": "2024-04-04T06:46:00Z",
  "published": "2023-08-10T00:30:52Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-33242"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://eprint.iacr.org/2017/552.pdf"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/fireblocks-labs/mpc-ecdsa-attacks-23"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/fireblocks-labs/zengo-lindell17-exploit-poc"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.fireblocks.com/blog/lindell17-abort-vulnerability-technical-report"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…