GHSA-7RW5-C532-37CV
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2023-08-10 00:30 – Updated: 2024-04-04 06:46
VLAI?
Details
Crypto wallets implementing the Lindell17 TSS protocol might allow an attacker to extract the full ECDSA private key by exfiltrating a single bit in every signature attempt (256 in total) because of not adhering to the paper's security proof's assumption regarding handling aborts after a failed signature.
Severity ?
9.6 (Critical)
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2023-33242"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-74"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2023-08-09T22:15:11Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Crypto wallets implementing the Lindell17 TSS protocol might allow an attacker to extract the full ECDSA private key by exfiltrating a single bit in every signature attempt (256 in total) because of not adhering to the paper\u0027s security proof\u0027s assumption regarding handling aborts after a failed signature.",
"id": "GHSA-7rw5-c532-37cv",
"modified": "2024-04-04T06:46:00Z",
"published": "2023-08-10T00:30:52Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-33242"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://eprint.iacr.org/2017/552.pdf"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/fireblocks-labs/mpc-ecdsa-attacks-23"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/fireblocks-labs/zengo-lindell17-exploit-poc"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.fireblocks.com/blog/lindell17-abort-vulnerability-technical-report"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…