GHSA-7VR7-48QP-H7JP

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 01:55 – Updated: 2022-05-01 01:55
VLAI?
Details

Multiple buffer overflows in the HandleChild function in server.c in Greylisting daemon (GLD) 1.3 and 1.4, when GLD is listening on a network interface, allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2005-1099"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2005-04-12T04:00:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Multiple buffer overflows in the HandleChild function in server.c in Greylisting daemon (GLD) 1.3 and 1.4, when GLD is listening on a network interface, allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code.",
  "id": "GHSA-7vr7-48qp-h7jp",
  "modified": "2022-05-01T01:55:33Z",
  "published": "2022-05-01T01:55:33Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2005-1099"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/20066"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=111339935903880\u0026w=2"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=111342432325670\u0026w=2"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/14941"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-200504-10.xml"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://securitytracker.com/alerts/2005/Apr/1013678.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.gasmi.net/down/gld-history"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.osvdb.org/15492"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…