GHSA-7W3G-6V3X-44MP

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-07-19 12:30 – Updated: 2026-07-20 15:31
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

f2fs: fix incorrect FI_NO_EXTENT handling in __destroy_extent_node()

When __destroy_extent_node() sets the inode flag FI_NO_EXTENT, it does not reset the length of the largest extent to 0 and update the inode folio. Since modifications to the extent tree are disallowed afterward, the cached largest extent may become stale. This can trigger the following error in xfstests generic/388:

F2FS-fs (dm-0): sanity_check_extent_cache: inode (ino=1761) extent info [220057, 57, 6] is incorrect, run fsck to fix

In the f2fs_drop_inode path, __destroy_extent_node() does not need to guarantee that et->node_cnt is 0, because concurrency with writeback is expected in this path, and writeback may update the extent cache.

This patch reverts commit ed78aeebef05 ("f2fs: fix node_cnt race between extent node destroy and writeback"), and remove the unnecessary zero check of et->node_cnt.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-63812"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-07-19T12:16:54Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nf2fs: fix incorrect FI_NO_EXTENT handling in __destroy_extent_node()\n\nWhen __destroy_extent_node() sets the inode flag FI_NO_EXTENT, it does\nnot reset the length of the largest extent to 0 and update the inode\nfolio. Since modifications to the extent tree are disallowed afterward,\nthe cached largest extent may become stale. This can trigger the\nfollowing error in xfstests generic/388:\n\nF2FS-fs (dm-0): sanity_check_extent_cache: inode (ino=1761) extent info [220057, 57, 6] is incorrect, run fsck to fix\n\nIn the f2fs_drop_inode path, __destroy_extent_node() does not need to\nguarantee that et-\u003enode_cnt is 0, because concurrency with writeback\nis expected in this path, and writeback may update the extent cache.\n\nThis patch reverts commit ed78aeebef05 (\"f2fs: fix node_cnt race between\nextent node destroy and writeback\"), and remove the unnecessary zero\ncheck of et-\u003enode_cnt.",
  "id": "GHSA-7w3g-6v3x-44mp",
  "modified": "2026-07-20T15:31:47Z",
  "published": "2026-07-19T12:30:23Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-63812"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1f70ddb28a3c71df124da5fa4040c808116d6bb9"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/20190e498057997532c7f186d081011f18e0a462"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/58a5deb220bcac4c73bf58954c0845644c997487"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7e4d8f98be63f98856a5176b9188dada6e7ba9ee"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/edf12cbeeeabe799bd2ee21fdb5c336cce6fbad7"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…