ghsa-7wxw-9v42-w9g6
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 04:13
Modified
2022-05-17 04:13
Details
Node.js 0.8 before 0.8.28 and 0.10 before 0.10.30 does not consider the possibility of recursive processing that triggers V8 garbage collection in conjunction with a V8 interrupt, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory corruption and application crash) via deep JSON objects whose parsing lets this interrupt mask an overflow of the program stack.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2014-5256" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-119" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2014-09-05T17:55:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "Node.js 0.8 before 0.8.28 and 0.10 before 0.10.30 does not consider the possibility of recursive processing that triggers V8 garbage collection in conjunction with a V8 interrupt, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory corruption and application crash) via deep JSON objects whose parsing lets this interrupt mask an overflow of the program stack.", "id": "GHSA-7wxw-9v42-w9g6", "modified": "2022-05-17T04:13:18Z", "published": "2022-05-17T04:13:18Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2014-5256" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/joyent/node/commit/530af9cb8e700e7596b3ec812bad123c9fa06356" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://advisories.mageia.org/MGASA-2014-0516.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://blog.nodejs.org/2014/07/31/v8-memory-corruption-stack-overflow" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/61260" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21684769" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2015:142" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading...
Loading...
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.