ghsa-7xr6-jcgr-7226
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-03 03:07
Modified
2022-05-03 03:07
Details

Vulnerability in GIOP dissector in Ethereal before 0.9.3 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption).

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2002-0404"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2002-06-18T04:00:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Vulnerability in GIOP dissector in Ethereal before 0.9.3 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption).",
  "id": "GHSA-7xr6-jcgr-7226",
  "modified": "2022-05-03T03:07:53Z",
  "published": "2022-05-03T03:07:53Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2002-0404"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://distro.conectiva.com/atualizacoes/?id=a\u0026anuncio=000505"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=102268626526119\u0026w=2"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2002/dsa-130"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.ethereal.com/appnotes/enpa-sa-00004.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.iss.net/security_center/static/9206.php"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2002-036.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2002-088.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2002-170.html"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/4808"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.