GHSA-8226-XX72-QRH6
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 01:28 – Updated: 2022-05-17 01:28
VLAI?
Details
The Expressway component in Cisco TelePresence Video Communication Server (VCS) uses the same default X.509 certificate across different customers' installations, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct man-in-the-middle attacks against SSL sessions by leveraging the certificate's trust relationship, aka Bug ID CSCue07471.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2014-0675"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2014-01-23T04:41:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "The Expressway component in Cisco TelePresence Video Communication Server (VCS) uses the same default X.509 certificate across different customers\u0027 installations, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct man-in-the-middle attacks against SSL sessions by leveraging the certificate\u0027s trust relationship, aka Bug ID CSCue07471.",
"id": "GHSA-8226-xx72-qrh6",
"modified": "2022-05-17T01:28:30Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T01:28:30Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2014-0675"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/90650"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://osvdb.org/102377"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/56621"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityNotice/CVE-2014-0675"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/viewAlert.x?alertId=32540"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/65101"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1029682"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…