ghsa-82cf-r7f2-jqcr
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-14 01:22
Modified
2022-05-14 01:22
Details

An issue was discovered in icoutils 0.31.1. A buffer overflow was observed in the "decode_ne_resource_id" function in the "restable.c" source file. This is happening because the "len" parameter for memcpy is not checked for size and thus becomes a negative integer in the process, resulting in a failed memcpy. This affects wrestool.

Show details on source website


{
   affected: [],
   aliases: [
      "CVE-2017-6009",
   ],
   database_specific: {
      cwe_ids: [
         "CWE-119",
      ],
      github_reviewed: false,
      github_reviewed_at: null,
      nvd_published_at: "2017-02-16T11:59:00Z",
      severity: "MODERATE",
   },
   details: "An issue was discovered in icoutils 0.31.1. A buffer overflow was observed in the \"decode_ne_resource_id\" function in the \"restable.c\" source file. This is happening because the \"len\" parameter for memcpy is not checked for size and thus becomes a negative integer in the process, resulting in a failed memcpy. This affects wrestool.",
   id: "GHSA-82cf-r7f2-jqcr",
   modified: "2022-05-14T01:22:08Z",
   published: "2022-05-14T01:22:08Z",
   references: [
      {
         type: "ADVISORY",
         url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-6009",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=854050",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201801-12",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0837.html",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-3807",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/96292",
      },
   ],
   schema_version: "1.4.0",
   severity: [
      {
         score: "CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
         type: "CVSS_V3",
      },
   ],
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.

Security Advisory comment format.

This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.

UUIDv4 of the comment
UUIDv4 of the Vulnerability-Lookup instance
When the comment was created originally
When the comment was last updated
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
The identifier of the vulnerability (CVE ID, GHSA-ID, PYSEC ID, etc.).



Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.