ghsa-82cf-r7f2-jqcr
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-14 01:22
Modified
2022-05-14 01:22
Severity ?
Details
An issue was discovered in icoutils 0.31.1. A buffer overflow was observed in the "decode_ne_resource_id" function in the "restable.c" source file. This is happening because the "len" parameter for memcpy is not checked for size and thus becomes a negative integer in the process, resulting in a failed memcpy. This affects wrestool.
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2017-6009", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [ "CWE-119", ], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2017-02-16T11:59:00Z", severity: "MODERATE", }, details: "An issue was discovered in icoutils 0.31.1. A buffer overflow was observed in the \"decode_ne_resource_id\" function in the \"restable.c\" source file. This is happening because the \"len\" parameter for memcpy is not checked for size and thus becomes a negative integer in the process, resulting in a failed memcpy. This affects wrestool.", id: "GHSA-82cf-r7f2-jqcr", modified: "2022-05-14T01:22:08Z", published: "2022-05-14T01:22:08Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-6009", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=854050", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201801-12", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2017-0837.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.debian.org/security/2017/dsa-3807", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/96292", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [ { score: "CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", type: "CVSS_V3", }, ], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.