ghsa-82v2-59rq-5h73
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-01 23:27
Modified
2022-05-01 23:27
Details
Integer overflow in Microsoft PowerPoint Viewer 2003 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a PowerPoint file with a malformed picture index that triggers memory corruption, related to handling of CString objects, aka "Memory Allocation Vulnerability."
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2008-0120" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2008-08-13T00:41:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "Integer overflow in Microsoft PowerPoint Viewer 2003 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a PowerPoint file with a malformed picture index that triggers memory corruption, related to handling of CString objects, aka \"Memory Allocation Vulnerability.\"", "id": "GHSA-82v2-59rq-5h73", "modified": "2022-05-01T23:27:46Z", "published": "2022-05-01T23:27:46Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2008-0120" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/security-updates/securitybulletins/2008/ms08-051" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A5768" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://labs.idefense.com/intelligence/vulnerabilities/display.php?id=739" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=121915960406986\u0026w=2" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/31453" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/30552" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1020676" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.us-cert.gov/cas/techalerts/TA08-225A.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2008/2355" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.