GHSA-8435-JJPF-8G76
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-14 02:44 – Updated: 2025-04-11 03:36
VLAI?
Details
The Cisco Content Services Switch (CSS) 11500 with software 8.20.4.02 and the Application Control Engine (ACE) 4710 with software A2(3.0) do not properly handle LF header terminators in situations where the GET line is terminated by CRLF, which allows remote attackers to conduct HTTP request smuggling attacks and possibly bypass intended header insertions via crafted header data, as demonstrated by an LF character between the ClientCert-Subject and ClientCert-Subject-CN headers. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2010-1576.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2010-2629"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-20"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2010-07-06T17:17:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "The Cisco Content Services Switch (CSS) 11500 with software 8.20.4.02 and the Application Control Engine (ACE) 4710 with software A2(3.0) do not properly handle LF header terminators in situations where the GET line is terminated by CRLF, which allows remote attackers to conduct HTTP request smuggling attacks and possibly bypass intended header insertions via crafted header data, as demonstrated by an LF character between the ClientCert-Subject and ClientCert-Subject-CN headers. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2010-1576.",
"id": "GHSA-8435-jjpf-8g76",
"modified": "2025-04-11T03:36:57Z",
"published": "2022-05-14T02:44:08Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2010-2629"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1024167"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1024168"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/512144/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/41315"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.vsecurity.com/resources/advisory/20100702-1"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…