GHSA-85Q6-7XQ9-8QQF
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 04:03 – Updated: 2022-05-17 04:03
VLAI?
Details
Juniper Junos OS 9.1 through 11.4 before 11.4R11, 12.1 before R10, 12.1X44 before D40, 12.1X46 before D30, 12.1X47 before D11 and 12.147-D15, 12.1X48 before D41 and D62, 12.2 before R8, 12.2X50 before D70, 12.3 before R6, 13.1 before R4-S2, 13.1X49 before D49, 13.1X50 before 30, 13.2 before R4, 13.2X50 before D20, 13.2X51 before D25, 13.2X52 before D15, 13.3 before R2, and 14.1 before R1, when supporting 4-byte AS numbers and a BGP peer does not, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory corruption and RDP routing process crash and restart) via crafted transitive attributes in a BGP UPDATE.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2014-3818"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-119"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2014-10-14T14:55:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Juniper Junos OS 9.1 through 11.4 before 11.4R11, 12.1 before R10, 12.1X44 before D40, 12.1X46 before D30, 12.1X47 before D11 and 12.147-D15, 12.1X48 before D41 and D62, 12.2 before R8, 12.2X50 before D70, 12.3 before R6, 13.1 before R4-S2, 13.1X49 before D49, 13.1X50 before 30, 13.2 before R4, 13.2X50 before D20, 13.2X51 before D25, 13.2X52 before D15, 13.3 before R2, and 14.1 before R1, when supporting 4-byte AS numbers and a BGP peer does not, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory corruption and RDP routing process crash and restart) via crafted transitive attributes in a BGP UPDATE.",
"id": "GHSA-85q6-7xq9-8qqf",
"modified": "2022-05-17T04:03:04Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T04:03:04Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2014-3818"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://kb.juniper.net/InfoCenter/index?page=content\u0026id=JSA10653"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1031009"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…