ghsa-8766-hj6c-9qw4
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 00:32
Modified
2022-05-17 00:32
Details
Memory leak in the dtls1_buffer_record function in d1_pkt.c in OpenSSL 1.0.0 before 1.0.0p and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1k allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) by sending many duplicate records for the next epoch, leading to failure of replay detection.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2015-0206" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-119" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2015-01-09T02:59:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "Memory leak in the dtls1_buffer_record function in d1_pkt.c in OpenSSL 1.0.0 before 1.0.0p and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1k allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) by sending many duplicate records for the next epoch, leading to failure of replay detection.", "id": "GHSA-8766-hj6c-9qw4", "modified": "2022-05-17T00:32:13Z", "published": "2022-05-17T00:32:13Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-0206" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/103b171d8fc282ef435f8de9afbf7782e312961f" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bto.bluecoat.com/security-advisory/sa88" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/99704" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://kc.mcafee.com/corporate/index?page=content\u0026id=SB10102" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://kc.mcafee.com/corporate/index?page=content\u0026id=SB10108" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv_20150108.txt" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-January/147938.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2015-January/148363.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-01/msg00021.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-05/msg00026.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2015-07/msg00037.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=142721102728110\u0026w=2" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=143748090628601\u0026w=2" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=144050155601375\u0026w=2" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=144050205101530\u0026w=2" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=144050254401665\u0026w=2" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=144050297101809\u0026w=2" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-0066.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20150310-ssl" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2015/dsa-3125" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2015:019" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2015:062" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpujul2016-2881720.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/security-advisory/cpuoct2017-3236626.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/bulletinjan2015-2370101.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/cpuapr2015-2365600.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/cpujul2015-2367936.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/cpuoct2015-2367953.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/71940" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/91787" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1033378" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading...
Loading...
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.