ghsa-87f2-g6cv-pjh2
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-14 02:18
Modified
2022-05-14 02:18
Severity ?
Details
The KEYS subsystem in the Linux kernel through 4.13.7 mishandles use of add_key for a key that already exists but is uninstantiated, which allows local users to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference and system crash) or possibly have unspecified other impact via a crafted system call.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2017-15299" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [ "CWE-476" ], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2017-10-14T23:29:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "The KEYS subsystem in the Linux kernel through 4.13.7 mishandles use of add_key for a key that already exists but is uninstantiated, which allows local users to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference and system crash) or possibly have unspecified other impact via a crafted system call.", "id": "GHSA-87f2-g6cv-pjh2", "modified": "2022-05-14T02:18:43Z", "published": "2022-05-14T02:18:43Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-15299" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0654" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1498016" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2017/12/msg00004.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://marc.info/?t=150654188100001\u0026r=1\u0026w=2" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://marc.info/?t=150783958600011\u0026r=1\u0026w=2" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://usn.ubuntu.com/3798-1" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://usn.ubuntu.com/3798-2" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org/msg1499828.html" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [ { "score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H", "type": "CVSS_V3" } ] }
Loading...
Loading...
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.