ghsa-87h8-h6wc-7xhj
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-01 01:50
Modified
2022-05-01 01:50
Details
Stack-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Word 2000 and Word 2002, and Microsoft Works Suites 2000 through 2004, might allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a .doc file with long font information.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2005-0564" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2005-07-12T04:00:00Z", "severity": "HIGH" }, "details": "Stack-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Word 2000 and Word 2002, and Microsoft Works Suites 2000 through 2004, might allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a .doc file with long font information.", "id": "GHSA-87h8-h6wc-7xhj", "modified": "2022-05-01T01:50:30Z", "published": "2022-05-01T01:50:30Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2005-0564" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/security-updates/securitybulletins/2005/ms05-035" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A1190" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A1331" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.idefense.com/application/poi/display?id=281\u0026type=vulnerabilities" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/218621" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.us-cert.gov/cas/techalerts/TA05-193A.html" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading...
Loading...
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.