GHSA-88J9-HR3G-C3JW
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 07:17 – Updated: 2022-05-01 07:17
VLAI?
Details
Buffer overflow in SAP DB and MaxDB before 7.6.00.30 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long database name when connecting via a WebDBM client.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2006-4305"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2006-08-30T01:04:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Buffer overflow in SAP DB and MaxDB before 7.6.00.30 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long database name when connecting via a WebDBM client.",
"id": "GHSA-88j9-hr3g-c3jw",
"modified": "2022-05-01T07:17:24Z",
"published": "2022-05-01T07:17:24Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2006-4305"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/28636"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://dev.mysql.com/doc/maxdb/changes/changes_7.6.00.32.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/21677"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/22518"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://securitytracker.com/id?1016766"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2006/dsa-1190"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/444601/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/19660"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.symantec.com/enterprise/research/SYMSA-2006-009.txt"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2006/3410"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…