GHSA-88WC-CM64-WGFF

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 01:28 – Updated: 2022-05-17 01:28
VLAI?
Details

The client in IBM Cognos TM1 9.5.2.3 before IF5, 10.1.1.2 before IF1, 10.2.0.2 before IF1, and 10.2.2.0 before IF1 stores obfuscated passwords in memory, which allows remote authenticated users to obtain sensitive cleartext information via an unspecified security tool.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2014-0863"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2014-09-05T01:55:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "The client in IBM Cognos TM1 9.5.2.3 before IF5, 10.1.1.2 before IF1, 10.2.0.2 before IF1, and 10.2.2.0 before IF1 stores obfuscated passwords in memory, which allows remote authenticated users to obtain sensitive cleartext information via an unspecified security tool.",
  "id": "GHSA-88wc-cm64-wgff",
  "modified": "2022-05-17T01:28:04Z",
  "published": "2022-05-17T01:28:04Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2014-0863"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/90937"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21682397"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/69594"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id/1030805"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…