GHSA-89G7-22C8-3J23
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-06-19 19:23 – Updated: 2026-06-19 19:23Description
When a #[LiveProp] is typed as a DateTimeInterface and no explicit format is configured, Symfony\UX\LiveComponent\LiveComponentHydrator::hydrateObjectValue() falls back to new $className($value). The DateTime / DateTimeImmutable constructors accept relative strings such as "now", "tomorrow", or "+10 years", so a writable, format-less date prop can be pushed to an arbitrary point in time by the client. Components that rely on a date prop to gate time-based business logic can be moved past those checks by a frontend payload that no maintainer would consider a valid date.
Resolution
hydrateObjectValue() now parses format-less date props strictly with createFromFormat(DateTimeInterface::RFC3339, ...), matching the format already emitted by dehydrateObjectValue(). Normal round-trips are unaffected; only inputs that aren't valid RFC 3339 are now rejected, which is consistent with how a format-configured prop already behaved.
The patch for this issue is available here for branch 2.x (and forward-ported to 3.x).
Credits
Symfony would like to thank Pascal Cescon for reporting the issue and Hugo Alliaume for providing the fix.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Packagist",
"name": "symfony/ux-live-component"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "2.8.0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.36.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "Packagist",
"name": "symfony/ux-live-component"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "3.0.0"
},
{
"fixed": "3.1.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-49208"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-20"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2026-06-19T19:23:55Z",
"nvd_published_at": null,
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "### Description\n\nWhen a `#[LiveProp]` is typed as a `DateTimeInterface` and no explicit `format` is configured, `Symfony\\UX\\LiveComponent\\LiveComponentHydrator::hydrateObjectValue()` falls back to `new $className($value)`. The `DateTime` / `DateTimeImmutable` constructors accept relative strings such as `\"now\"`, `\"tomorrow\"`, or `\"+10 years\"`, so a writable, format-less date prop can be pushed to an arbitrary point in time by the client. Components that rely on a date prop to gate time-based business logic can be moved past those checks by a frontend payload that no maintainer would consider a valid date.\n\n### Resolution\n\n`hydrateObjectValue()` now parses format-less date props strictly with `createFromFormat(DateTimeInterface::RFC3339, ...)`, matching the format already emitted by `dehydrateObjectValue()`. Normal round-trips are unaffected; only inputs that aren\u0027t valid RFC 3339 are now rejected, which is consistent with how a format-configured prop already behaved.\n\nThe patch for this issue is available [here](https://github.com/symfony/ux/commit/d24d78fda6df2d5964312255943ebf3a217b79a2) for branch 2.x (and forward-ported to 3.x).\n\n### Credits\n\nSymfony would like to thank Pascal Cescon for reporting the issue and Hugo Alliaume for providing the fix.",
"id": "GHSA-89g7-22c8-3j23",
"modified": "2026-06-19T19:23:55Z",
"published": "2026-06-19T19:23:55Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/symfony/ux/security/advisories/GHSA-89g7-22c8-3j23"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/symfony/ux/commit/d24d78fda6df2d5964312255943ebf3a217b79a2"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/FriendsOfPHP/security-advisories/blob/master/symfony/ux-live-component/CVE-2026-49208.yaml"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/symfony/ux"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "ux-live-component: Format-less date LiveProps parsed with the permissive DateTime constructor"
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.