ghsa-89wj-8hfp-9mjq
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-17 05:35
Modified
2022-05-17 05:35
Details
Incomplete blacklist vulnerability in the svEscape function in settings/plugins/ifcfg-rh/shvar.c in the ifcfg-rh plug-in for GNOME NetworkManager 0.9.1, 0.9.0, 0.8.1, and possibly other versions, when PolicyKit is configured to allow users to create new connections, allows local users to execute arbitrary commands via a newline character in the name for a new network connection, which is not properly handled when writing to the ifcfg file.
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2011-3364" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2011-11-04T21:55:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "Incomplete blacklist vulnerability in the svEscape function in settings/plugins/ifcfg-rh/shvar.c in the ifcfg-rh plug-in for GNOME NetworkManager 0.9.1, 0.9.0, 0.8.1, and possibly other versions, when PolicyKit is configured to allow users to create new connections, allows local users to execute arbitrary commands via a newline character in the name for a new network connection, which is not properly handled when writing to the ifcfg file.", "id": "GHSA-89wj-8hfp-9mjq", "modified": "2022-05-17T05:35:13Z", "published": "2022-05-17T05:35:13Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2011-3364" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737338" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2011-September/066828.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2011:171" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2011-1338.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://xorl.wordpress.com/2011/10/09/cve-2011-3364-gnome-networkmanager-local-privilege-escalation" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.