GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GHSA-8CMF-4X36-QP8X

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-08-27 06:31 – Updated: 2026-08-27 06:31
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

s390/zcrypt: Improve CCA CPRB length and overflow checks

The xcrb_msg_to_type6cprb_msgx() function lacks proper input validation, creating security vulnerabilities: 1. Integer overflow after CEIL4 alignment: Signed int variables could overflow during 4-byte boundary alignment, causing undersized buffer allocations or incorrect bounds checking. 2. Missing minimum size validation: The CPRBX structure is copied from userspace without verifying sufficient buffer length. Undersized buffers cause uninitialized memory access when reading structure fields like cprbx.cprb_len and cprbx.domain. 3. Arithmetic overflow in sum calculations: Adding control block and data block sizes could overflow, bypassing size checks and enabling buffer overflows.

Fix by using size_t for length calculations, adding U32_MAX boundary checks after alignment, validating minimum control block size before copying from userspace, and detecting sum calculation overflows.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-80546"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-08-26T15:17:08Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ns390/zcrypt: Improve CCA CPRB length and overflow checks\n\nThe xcrb_msg_to_type6cprb_msgx() function lacks proper input\nvalidation, creating security vulnerabilities:\n1. Integer overflow after CEIL4 alignment: Signed int variables could\n   overflow during 4-byte boundary alignment, causing undersized\n   buffer allocations or incorrect bounds checking.\n2. Missing minimum size validation: The CPRBX structure is copied from\n   userspace without verifying sufficient buffer length. Undersized\n   buffers cause uninitialized memory access when reading structure\n   fields like cprbx.cprb_len and cprbx.domain.\n3. Arithmetic overflow in sum calculations: Adding control block and\n   data block sizes could overflow, bypassing size checks and enabling\n   buffer overflows.\n\nFix by using size_t for length calculations, adding U32_MAX boundary\nchecks after alignment, validating minimum control block size before\ncopying from userspace, and detecting sum calculation overflows.",
  "id": "GHSA-8cmf-4x36-qp8x",
  "modified": "2026-08-27T06:31:31Z",
  "published": "2026-08-27T06:31:31Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-80546"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/35ac6754ba6da45fd193f5ce3f665f7490b830d5"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/50fe5133dcb46449daf2435fa705264364411129"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…