ghsa-8f6x-v685-g2xc
Vulnerability from github
Published
2023-06-14 09:30
Modified
2025-02-13 18:58
Severity ?
6.5 (Medium) - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Summary
Apache Struts vulnerable to memory exhaustion
Details

Denial of service via out of memory (OOM) owing to not properly checking of list bounds. When a Multipart request has non-file normal form fields, Struts used to bring them into memory as Strings without checking their sizes. This could lead to OOM if developer has set struts.multipart.maxSize to a value equal or greater than the available memory.

Upgrade to Struts 2.5.31 or 6.1.2.1 or greater.

Show details on source website

To clipboard 

{
   affected: [
      {
         package: {
            ecosystem: "Maven",
            name: "org.apache.struts:struts2-core",
         },
         ranges: [
            {
               events: [
                  {
                     introduced: "0",
                  },
                  {
                     fixed: "2.5.31",
                  },
               ],
               type: "ECOSYSTEM",
            },
         ],
      },
      {
         package: {
            ecosystem: "Maven",
            name: "org.apache.struts:struts2-core",
         },
         ranges: [
            {
               events: [
                  {
                     introduced: "6.0.0",
                  },
                  {
                     fixed: "6.1.2.1",
                  },
               ],
               type: "ECOSYSTEM",
            },
         ],
      },
   ],
   aliases: [
      "CVE-2023-34149",
   ],
   database_specific: {
      cwe_ids: [
         "CWE-770",
      ],
      github_reviewed: true,
      github_reviewed_at: "2023-06-14T20:16:47Z",
      nvd_published_at: "2023-06-14T08:15:09Z",
      severity: "MODERATE",
   },
   details: "Denial of service via out of memory (OOM) owing to not properly checking of list bounds. When a Multipart request has non-file normal form fields, Struts used to bring them into memory as Strings without checking their sizes. This could lead to OOM if developer has set struts.multipart.maxSize to a value equal or greater than the available memory.\n\nUpgrade to Struts 2.5.31 or 6.1.2.1 or greater.",
   id: "GHSA-8f6x-v685-g2xc",
   modified: "2025-02-13T18:58:19Z",
   published: "2023-06-14T09:30:42Z",
   references: [
      {
         type: "ADVISORY",
         url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-34149",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://github.com/apache/struts/commit/2d6f1bc0a6f5ac575a56784ac6461816b67c4f21",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WW/S2-063",
      },
      {
         type: "PACKAGE",
         url: "https://github.com/apache/struts",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://github.com/apache/struts/releases/tag/STRUTS_2_5_31",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://github.com/apache/struts/releases/tag/STRUTS_6_1_2_1",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20230706-0005",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/06/14/2",
      },
   ],
   schema_version: "1.4.0",
   severity: [
      {
         score: "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
         type: "CVSS_V3",
      },
   ],
   summary: "Apache Struts vulnerable to memory exhaustion",
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.

Security Advisory comment format.

This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.

UUIDv4 of the comment
UUIDv4 of the Vulnerability-Lookup instance
When the comment was created originally
When the comment was last updated
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
The identifier of the vulnerability (CVE ID, GHSA-ID, PYSEC ID, etc.).



Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.




Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.