GHSA-8FH8-56W4-443Q
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 02:17 – Updated: 2022-05-17 02:17
VLAI?
Details
The ACL handling in rsyslog 3.12.1 to 3.20.0, 4.1.0, and 4.1.1 does not follow $AllowedSender directive, which allows remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions and spoof log messages or create a large number of spurious messages.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2008-5617"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2008-12-17T02:30:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "The ACL handling in rsyslog 3.12.1 to 3.20.0, 4.1.0, and 4.1.1 does not follow $AllowedSender directive, which allows remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions and spoof log messages or create a large number of spurious messages.",
"id": "GHSA-8fh8-56w4-443q",
"modified": "2022-05-17T02:17:25Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T02:17:25Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2008-5617"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/47080"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/32857"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.rsyslog.com/Article322.phtml"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.rsyslog.com/Article327.phtml"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.rsyslog.com/Topic4.phtml"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/32630"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…