GHSA-8FQX-7PV4-3JWM
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2017-10-24 18:33 – Updated: 2023-05-26 16:54
VLAI
Summary
Improper Input Validation in actionpack
Details
Ruby on Rails 2.1 before 2.1.3 and 2.2.x before 2.2.2 does not verify tokens for requests with certain content types, which allows remote attackers to bypass cross-site request forgery (CSRF) protection for requests to applications that rely on this protection, as demonstrated using text/plain.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "RubyGems",
"name": "actionpack"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "2.1.0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.1.3"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
},
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "RubyGems",
"name": "actionpack"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "2.2.0"
},
{
"fixed": "2.2.2"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2008-7248"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-20"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2020-06-16T21:25:28Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2009-12-16T01:30:00Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "Ruby on Rails 2.1 before 2.1.3 and 2.2.x before 2.2.2 does not verify tokens for requests with certain content types, which allows remote attackers to bypass cross-site request forgery (CSRF) protection for requests to applications that rely on this protection, as demonstrated using text/plain.",
"id": "GHSA-8fqx-7pv4-3jwm",
"modified": "2023-05-26T16:54:58Z",
"published": "2017-10-24T18:33:38Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2008-7248"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/rails/rails/commit/099a98e9b7108dae3e0f78b207e0a7dc5913bd1a"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2008-7248"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=544329"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/rails/rails"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/rubysec/ruby-advisory-db/blob/master/gems/actionpack/CVE-2008-7248.yml"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-security/browse_thread/thread/d741ee286e36e301?hl=en"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2010-03/msg00004.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://pseudo-flaw.net/content/web-browsers/form-data-encoding-roundup"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://web.archive.org/web/20090906010200/https://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2009/2544"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://weblog.rubyonrails.org/2008/11/18/potential-circumvention-of-csrf-protection-in-rails-2-1"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2009/11/28/1"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2009/12/02/2"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://www.rorsecurity.info/journal/2008/11/19/circumvent-rails-csrf-protection.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-security/browse_thread/thread/d741ee286e36e301?hl=en"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2010-03/msg00004.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://pseudo-flaw.net/content/web-browsers/form-data-encoding-roundup"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://weblog.rubyonrails.org/2008/11/18/potential-circumvention-of-csrf-protection-in-rails-2-1"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2009/11/28/1"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2009/12/02/2"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [],
"summary": "Improper Input Validation in actionpack"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…