ghsa-8fvv-pqph-jh9m
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-14 02:17
Modified
2022-05-14 02:17
Details
Unspecified vulnerability in the vc1_decode_frame function in libavcodec/vc1dec.c in FFmpeg before 0.11 and Libav 0.8.x before 0.8.4 has unknown impact and attack vectors, related to inconsistencies in "coded slice positions and interlacing" that trigger "out of array writes."
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2012-2796", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2012-09-10T22:55:00Z", severity: "HIGH", }, details: "Unspecified vulnerability in the vc1_decode_frame function in libavcodec/vc1dec.c in FFmpeg before 0.11 and Libav 0.8.x before 0.8.4 has unknown impact and attack vectors, related to inconsistencies in \"coded slice positions and interlacing\" that trigger \"out of array writes.\"", id: "GHSA-8fvv-pqph-jh9m", modified: "2022-05-14T02:17:51Z", published: "2022-05-14T02:17:51Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2012-2796", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://ffmpeg.org/security.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://git.videolan.org/?p=ffmpeg.git;a=commitdiff;h=5e59a77cec804a9b44c60ea22c17beba6453ef23", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://libav.org/releases/libav-0.8.4.changelog", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://secunia.com/advisories/50468", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://secunia.com/advisories/51257", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.mandriva.com/security/advisories?name=MDVSA-2013:079", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/08/31/3", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/09/02/4", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/55355", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.