ghsa-8gxc-83hw-9578
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-24 17:18
Modified
2024-06-18 00:31
Severity ?
Details
Multiple products that implement the IP Encapsulation within IP standard (RFC 2003, STD 1) decapsulate and route IP-in-IP traffic without any validation, which could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to route arbitrary traffic via an exposed network interface and lead to spoofing, access control bypass, and other unexpected network behaviors.
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2020-10136", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [ "CWE-290", ], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2020-06-02T09:15:00Z", severity: "MODERATE", }, details: "Multiple products that implement the IP Encapsulation within IP standard (RFC 2003, STD 1) decapsulate and route IP-in-IP traffic without any validation, which could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to route arbitrary traffic via an exposed network interface and lead to spoofing, access control bypass, and other unexpected network behaviors.", id: "GHSA-8gxc-83hw-9578", modified: "2024-06-18T00:31:25Z", published: "2022-05-24T17:18:58Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-10136", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6169", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://kb.cert.org/vuls/id/636397", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-nxos-ipip-dos-kCT9X4", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://www.digi.com/resources/security", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/636397", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [ { score: "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L", type: "CVSS_V3", }, ], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.