ghsa-8hj3-wvpv-xrpr
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-03 03:09
Modified
2022-05-03 03:09
Details
Buffer overflow in tryelf() in readelf.c of the file command allows attackers to execute arbitrary code as the user running file, possibly via a large entity size value in an ELF header (elfhdr.e_shentsize).
{ "affected": [], "aliases": [ "CVE-2003-0102" ], "database_specific": { "cwe_ids": [], "github_reviewed": false, "github_reviewed_at": null, "nvd_published_at": "2003-03-18T05:00:00Z", "severity": "MODERATE" }, "details": "Buffer overflow in tryelf() in readelf.c of the file command allows attackers to execute arbitrary code as the user running file, possibly via a large entity size value in an ELF header (elfhdr.e_shentsize).", "id": "GHSA-8hj3-wvpv-xrpr", "modified": "2022-05-03T03:09:39Z", "published": "2022-05-03T03:09:39Z", "references": [ { "type": "ADVISORY", "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2003-0102" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/11469" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://lwn.net/Alerts/34908" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq\u0026m=104680706201721\u0026w=2" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.debian.org/security/2003/dsa-260" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.idefense.com/advisory/03.04.03.txt" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/611865" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.mandrakesoft.com/security/advisories?name=MDKSA-2003:030" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.novell.com/linux/security/advisories/2003_017_file.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2003-086.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2003-087.html" }, { "type": "WEB", "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/7008" } ], "schema_version": "1.4.0", "severity": [] }
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.