ghsa-8j74-6x75-vf94
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-02 03:31
Modified
2022-05-02 03:31
Details

Cisco Unified Communications Manager (aka CUCM, formerly CallManager) 4.x, 5.x before 5.1(3g), 6.x before 6.1(4), 7.0 before 7.0(2a)su1, and 7.1 before 7.1(2) allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (file-descriptor exhaustion and SCCP outage) via a flood of TCP packets, aka Bug ID CSCsx32236.

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2009-2053"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2009-08-27T17:00:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Cisco Unified Communications Manager (aka CUCM, formerly CallManager) 4.x, 5.x before 5.1(3g), 6.x before 6.1(4), 7.0 before 7.0(2a)su1, and 7.1 before 7.1(2) allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (file-descriptor exhaustion and SCCP outage) via a flood of TCP packets, aka Bug ID CSCsx32236.",
  "id": "GHSA-8j74-6x75-vf94",
  "modified": "2022-05-02T03:31:15Z",
  "published": "2022-05-02T03:31:15Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2009-2053"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://osvdb.org/57455"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/36498"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/36499"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/products_security_advisory09186a0080af2d11.shtml"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/36152"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securitytracker.com/id?1022775"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.