ghsa-8m2v-68m9-q2c7
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-24 19:13
Modified
2022-10-31 12:00
Severity ?
Details
The ElGamal implementation in Libgcrypt before 1.9.4 allows plaintext recovery because, during interaction between two cryptographic libraries, a certain dangerous combination of the prime defined by the receiver's public key, the generator defined by the receiver's public key, and the sender's ephemeral exponents can lead to a cross-configuration attack against OpenPGP.
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2021-40528", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [ "CWE-327", ], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2021-09-06T19:15:00Z", severity: "MODERATE", }, details: "The ElGamal implementation in Libgcrypt before 1.9.4 allows plaintext recovery because, during interaction between two cryptographic libraries, a certain dangerous combination of the prime defined by the receiver's public key, the generator defined by the receiver's public key, and the sender's ephemeral exponents can lead to a cross-configuration attack against OpenPGP.", id: "GHSA-8m2v-68m9-q2c7", modified: "2022-10-31T12:00:21Z", published: "2022-05-24T19:13:02Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-40528", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://eprint.iacr.org/2021/923", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://git.gnupg.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=libgcrypt.git;a=commit;h=3462280f2e23e16adf3ed5176e0f2413d8861320", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://ibm.github.io/system-security-research-updates/2021/07/20/insecurity-elgamal-pt1", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://ibm.github.io/system-security-research-updates/2021/09/06/insecurity-elgamal-pt2", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202210-13", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [ { score: "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N", type: "CVSS_V3", }, ], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.