GHSA-8M7C-8M39-RV4X

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-05-05 18:46 – Updated: 2026-05-05 18:46
VLAI
Summary
awslabs/tough Delegated Roles have a Signature Threshold Bypass
Details

Summary

Improper verification of cryptographic signature uniqueness in delegated role validation in awslabs/tough before tough-v0.22.0 allows remote authenticated users to bypass the TUF signature threshold requirement by duplicating a valid signature, causing the client to accept forged delegated role metadata.

Impact

The tough library, prior to 0.22.0, does not properly verify the uniqueness of keys in the signatures provided to meet the threshold of cryptographic signatures in delegated targets. It allows actors with access to a valid signing key to create multiple valid signatures in order to circumvent TUF requiring a minimum threshold of unique keys before the metadata is considered valid.

Patches

This issue has been addressed in tough version 0.22.0 and tuftool version 0.15.0. We recommend upgrading to the latest version and ensuring any forked or derivative code is patched to incorporate the new fixes.

Workarounds

No workarounds to this issue are known.

References

  • CVE-2026-6966

If there are any questions or comments about this advisory, please contact [AWS/Amazon] Security via the vulnerability reporting page or directly via email to aws-security@amazon.com. Please do not create a public GitHub issue.

Acknowledgement

Amazon Web Services Labs would like to thank Emily Albini of Oxide Computer and Oleh Konko of 1seal for collaborating on this issue through the coordinated vulnerability disclosure process

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "crates.io",
        "name": "tough"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "0.22.0"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    },
    {
      "package": {
        "ecosystem": "crates.io",
        "name": "tuftool"
      },
      "ranges": [
        {
          "events": [
            {
              "introduced": "0"
            },
            {
              "fixed": "0.15.0"
            }
          ],
          "type": "ECOSYSTEM"
        }
      ]
    }
  ],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-6966"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-347"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": true,
    "github_reviewed_at": "2026-05-05T18:46:09Z",
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-04-24T20:16:28Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "### Summary\nImproper verification of cryptographic signature uniqueness in delegated role validation in awslabs/tough before tough-v0.22.0 allows remote authenticated users to bypass the TUF signature threshold requirement by duplicating a valid signature, causing the client to accept forged delegated role metadata.\n\n### Impact\nThe tough library, prior to 0.22.0, does not properly verify the uniqueness of keys in the signatures provided to meet the threshold of cryptographic signatures in delegated targets. It allows actors with access to a valid signing key to create multiple valid signatures in order to circumvent TUF requiring a minimum threshold of unique keys before the metadata is considered valid.\n\n### Patches\nThis issue has been addressed in tough version 0.22.0 and tuftool version 0.15.0. We recommend upgrading to the latest version and ensuring any forked or derivative code is patched to incorporate the new fixes. \n\n### Workarounds\nNo workarounds to this issue are known.\n\n### References\n* CVE-2026-6966\n\nIf there are any questions or comments about this advisory, please contact [AWS/Amazon] Security via the [vulnerability reporting page](https://aws.amazon.com/security/vulnerability-reporting) or directly via email to [aws-security@amazon.com](mailto:aws-security@amazon.com). Please do not create a public GitHub issue.\n\n### Acknowledgement\n\nAmazon Web Services Labs would like to thank Emily Albini of Oxide Computer and Oleh Konko of 1seal for collaborating on this issue through the coordinated vulnerability disclosure process",
  "id": "GHSA-8m7c-8m39-rv4x",
  "modified": "2026-05-05T18:46:09Z",
  "published": "2026-05-05T18:46:09Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/awslabs/tough/security/advisories/GHSA-8m7c-8m39-rv4x"
    },
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-6966"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://aws.amazon.com/security/security-bulletins/2026-019-aws"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://crates.io/crates/tough/0.22.0"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://crates.io/crates/tuftool/0.15.0"
    },
    {
      "type": "PACKAGE",
      "url": "https://github.com/awslabs/tough"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/awslabs/tough/releases/tag/tough-v0.22.0"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://github.com/awslabs/tough/releases/tag/tuftool-v0.15.0"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    },
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:N",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ],
  "summary": "awslabs/tough Delegated Roles have a Signature Threshold Bypass"
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…