GHSA-8MHP-W344-HXG5
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-17 18:32 – Updated: 2026-09-17 18:32In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
RDMA/bng_re: return a timeout when firmware responses stall
__wait_for_resp() documents that it returns a non-zero error when a firmware command does not complete, and bng_re_rcfw_send_message() already marks the firmware as stalled when the helper returns -ENODEV.
However, the helper ignores wait_event_timeout() expiry. If the response slot remains in use after the timeout and after the polled CREQ service attempt, the loop starts another full timeout period and can repeat forever.
Return -ENODEV after a timed out wait that still has no response. The existing caller then marks FIRMWARE_STALL_DETECTED and returns -ETIMEDOUT to the command issuer.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-93153"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-09-17T17:18:10Z",
"severity": null
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nRDMA/bng_re: return a timeout when firmware responses stall\n\n__wait_for_resp() documents that it returns a non-zero error when a\nfirmware command does not complete, and bng_re_rcfw_send_message() already\nmarks the firmware as stalled when the helper returns -ENODEV.\n\nHowever, the helper ignores wait_event_timeout() expiry. If the response\nslot remains in use after the timeout and after the polled CREQ service\nattempt, the loop starts another full timeout period and can repeat\nforever.\n\nReturn -ENODEV after a timed out wait that still has no response. The\nexisting caller then marks FIRMWARE_STALL_DETECTED and returns\n-ETIMEDOUT to the command issuer.",
"id": "GHSA-8mhp-w344-hxg5",
"modified": "2026-09-17T18:32:12Z",
"published": "2026-09-17T18:32:12Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-93153"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/02d4ee65dc2e883f554169155937742e6014c243"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/5f9576c6734abca88a02db72c466e09d2eddf160"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.
Browse all ATT&CK techniques and the vulnerabilities related to each.
Related by attack behaviour
Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.