GHSA-8MRM-R7H3-C3HJ
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-07-20 06:30 – Updated: 2024-09-13 19:34
VLAI?
Summary
LoLLMS vulnerable to Expected Behavior Violation
Details
A path traversal vulnerability exists in the apply_settings function of parisneo/lollms versions prior to 9.5.1. The sanitize_path function does not adequately secure the discussion_db_name parameter, allowing attackers to manipulate the path and potentially write to important system folders.
Severity ?
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "PyPI",
"name": "lollms"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "9.5.1"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-6281"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-22",
"CWE-440"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2024-09-13T19:34:25Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2024-07-20T04:15:05Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "A path traversal vulnerability exists in the `apply_settings` function of parisneo/lollms versions prior to 9.5.1. The `sanitize_path` function does not adequately secure the `discussion_db_name` parameter, allowing attackers to manipulate the path and potentially write to important system folders.",
"id": "GHSA-8mrm-r7h3-c3hj",
"modified": "2024-09-13T19:34:25Z",
"published": "2024-07-20T06:30:35Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-6281"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/parisneo/lollms/commit/26a3ff35acf152b49e1087d5698ad4864c7b6092"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/parisneo/lollms"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://huntr.com/bounties/0a62f2fb-4e62-4128-9dc4-e8f1d959ac61"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "LoLLMS vulnerable to Expected Behavior Violation"
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…