GHSA-8P42-R5F7-3M7G
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 02:04 – Updated: 2025-01-16 21:30
VLAI?
Details
Buffer overflow in the AIM and ICQ module in Gaim before 1.5.0 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via an away message with a large number of AIM substitution strings, such as %t or %n.
Severity ?
9.8 (Critical)
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2005-2103"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-131"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2005-08-16T04:00:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Buffer overflow in the AIM and ICQ module in Gaim before 1.5.0 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) and possibly execute arbitrary code via an away message with a large number of AIM substitution strings, such as %t or %n.",
"id": "GHSA-8p42-r5f7-3m7g",
"modified": "2025-01-16T21:30:54Z",
"published": "2022-05-01T02:04:59Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2005-2103"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://oval.cisecurity.org/repository/search/definition/oval%3Aorg.mitre.oval%3Adef%3A11477"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://usn.ubuntu.com/168-1"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://gaim.sourceforge.net/security/?id=22"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.novell.com/linux/security/advisories/2005_19_sr.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2005-589.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.redhat.com/support/errata/RHSA-2005-627.html"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/426078/100/0/threaded"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/14531"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
}
]
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…