GHSA-8P72-RCQ4-H6PW
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2024-07-08 15:25 – Updated: 2024-07-08 19:06Summary
There was already a reported SSRF vulnerability via file import. https://github.com/directus/directus/security/advisories/GHSA-j3rg-3rgm-537h It was fixed by resolving all DNS names and checking if the requested IP is an internal IP address.
However it is possible to bypass this security measure and execute a SSRF using redirects. Directus allows redirects when importing file from the URL and does not check the result URL. Thus, it is possible to execute a request to an internal IP, for example to 127.0.0.1.
However, it is blind SSRF, because Directus also uses response interception technique to get the information about the connect from the socket directly and it does not show a response if the IP address is internal (nice fix, by the way :) ).
But the blindness does not fully mitigate the impact of the vulnerability. The blind SSRF is still exploitable in the real life scenarios, because there could be a vulnerable software inside of the network which can be exploited with GET request. I will show the example in the PoC. Also, you can check HackTricks page with some known cases.
Details
Give all details on the vulnerability. Pointing to the incriminated source code is very helpful for the maintainer.
PoC
For testing I used the docker compose with the latest directus version. Here is my docker compose file
version: "3"
services:
directus:
image: directus/directus:10.8.3
ports:
- 8055:8055
volumes:
- ./database:/directus/database
- ./uploads:/directus/uploads
- ./extensions:/directus/extensions
environment:
KEY: "redacted"
SECRET: "redacted"
ADMIN_EMAIL: "admin@example.com"
ADMIN_PASSWORD: "redacted"
DB_CLIENT: "sqlite3"
DB_FILENAME: "/directus/database/data.db"
As a first step it is needed to setup a redirect server which will redirect the incoming request to some internal URL. I did it on my VPS with the public IP.

After it I setup a simple HTTP Server emulating the vulnerable application inside the internal network. It just execute any shell command provided in the cmd GET-parameter.

After it the directus import functionality was used

It initiates the following HTTP request
POST /files/import HTTP/1.1
Host: 127.0.0.1:8055
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:121.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/121.0
Accept: application/json, text/plain, */*
Accept-Language: en-US,en;q=0.5
Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate, br
Authorization: Bearer redacteed
Content-Type: application/json
Content-Length: 44
Origin: http://127.0.0.1:8055
Connection: close
Referer: http://127.0.0.1:8055/admin/files/+
Cookie: directus_refresh_token=redacted
Sec-Fetch-Dest: empty
Sec-Fetch-Mode: cors
Sec-Fetch-Site: same-origin
{"url":"http://94.103.84.233:801","data":{}}
It can be seen on the redirect server that the request came to it.

And we can also see the request in the localhost server (the same host as directus), which confirms the bypass and the SSRF.

And the rce_poc file was created.

Impact
The impact is Blind SSRF. Using it an attacker can initiate HTTP GET requests to the internal network. For example, it can be used to exploit some GET-based vulnerabilities of other software in the internal network.
Fix proposition
I think there are two ways to fix this vulnerability:
- Disallow redirects for the import requests
- Check the Location header in the import request response if it is present. Drop the request if the Location url points to the internal IP.
{
"affected": [
{
"package": {
"ecosystem": "npm",
"name": "@directus/api"
},
"ranges": [
{
"events": [
{
"introduced": "0"
},
{
"fixed": "17.1.0"
}
],
"type": "ECOSYSTEM"
}
]
}
],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2024-39699"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-918"
],
"github_reviewed": true,
"github_reviewed_at": "2024-07-08T15:25:50Z",
"nvd_published_at": "2024-07-08T16:15:08Z",
"severity": "MODERATE"
},
"details": "### Summary\nThere was already a reported SSRF vulnerability via file import. [https://github.com/directus/directus/security/advisories/GHSA-j3rg-3rgm-537h](https://github.com/directus/directus/security/advisories/GHSA-j3rg-3rgm-537h)\nIt was fixed by resolving all DNS names and checking if the requested IP is an internal IP address. \n\nHowever it is possible to bypass this security measure and execute a SSRF using redirects. Directus allows redirects when importing file from the URL and does not check the result URL. Thus, it is possible to execute a request to an internal IP, for example to 127.0.0.1.\n\nHowever, it is blind SSRF, because Directus also uses response interception technique to get the information about the connect from the socket directly and it does not show a response if the IP address is internal (nice fix, by the way :) ).\n\nBut the blindness does not fully mitigate the impact of the vulnerability. The blind SSRF is still exploitable in the real life scenarios, because there could be a vulnerable software inside of the network which can be exploited with GET request. I will show the example in the PoC. Also, you can check [HackTricks](https://book.hacktricks.xyz/pentesting-web/ssrf-server-side-request-forgery/ssrf-vulnerable-platforms) page with some known cases. \n\n### Details\n_Give all details on the vulnerability. Pointing to the incriminated source code is very helpful for the maintainer._\n\n### PoC\nFor testing I used the docker compose with the latest directus version. Here is my docker compose file\n```\nversion: \"3\"\nservices:\n directus:\n image: directus/directus:10.8.3\n ports:\n - 8055:8055\n volumes:\n - ./database:/directus/database\n - ./uploads:/directus/uploads\n - ./extensions:/directus/extensions\n environment:\n KEY: \"redacted\"\n SECRET: \"redacted\"\n ADMIN_EMAIL: \"admin@example.com\"\n ADMIN_PASSWORD: \"redacted\"\n DB_CLIENT: \"sqlite3\"\n DB_FILENAME: \"/directus/database/data.db\"\n```\n\nAs a first step it is needed to setup a redirect server which will redirect the incoming request to some internal URL. I did it on my VPS with the public IP.\n\n\u003cimg width=\"1035\" alt=\"image\" src=\"https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/156416961/296198555-870898b2-7b8a-4857-a8fe-5e28e85241b0.png\"\u003e\n\nAfter it I setup a simple HTTP Server emulating the vulnerable application inside the internal network. It just execute any shell command provided in the cmd GET-parameter.\n\n\u003cimg width=\"454\" alt=\"image\" src=\"https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/156416961/296198963-4465fa15-c6d6-4e8c-92a0-a2ae334ba79f.png\"\u003e\n\nAfter it the directus import functionality was used \n\n\u003cimg width=\"930\" alt=\"image\" src=\"https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/156416961/296199457-d5d8eb2d-1ca8-442e-b1bf-15ddb0f1947d.png\"\u003e\n\nIt initiates the following HTTP request\n\n```\nPOST /files/import HTTP/1.1\nHost: 127.0.0.1:8055\nUser-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:121.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/121.0\nAccept: application/json, text/plain, */*\nAccept-Language: en-US,en;q=0.5\nAccept-Encoding: gzip, deflate, br\nAuthorization: Bearer redacteed\nContent-Type: application/json\nContent-Length: 44\nOrigin: http://127.0.0.1:8055\nConnection: close\nReferer: http://127.0.0.1:8055/admin/files/+\nCookie: directus_refresh_token=redacted\nSec-Fetch-Dest: empty\nSec-Fetch-Mode: cors\nSec-Fetch-Site: same-origin\n\n{\"url\":\"http://94.103.84.233:801\",\"data\":{}}\n```\n\nIt can be seen on the redirect server that the request came to it.\n\n\n\nAnd we can also see the request in the localhost server (the same host as directus), which confirms the bypass and the SSRF.\n\n\n\u003cimg width=\"437\" alt=\"image\" src=\"https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/156416961/296201651-a9b61f5d-0ccd-4e3e-b137-e82fda8f5347.png\"\u003e\n\nAnd the rce_poc file was created. \n\n\u003cimg width=\"538\" alt=\"image\" src=\"https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/156416961/296201869-fed5fa94-ece5-497d-a091-c422b1f540a0.png\"\u003e\n\n\n\n\n### Impact\nThe impact is Blind SSRF. Using it an attacker can initiate HTTP GET requests to the internal network. For example, it can be used to exploit some GET-based vulnerabilities of other software in the internal network.\n\n### Fix proposition\n\nI think there are two ways to fix this vulnerability:\n\n- Disallow redirects for the import requests\n- Check the Location header in the import request response if it is present. Drop the request if the Location url points to the internal IP.\n",
"id": "GHSA-8p72-rcq4-h6pw",
"modified": "2024-07-08T19:06:20Z",
"published": "2024-07-08T15:25:50Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/directus/directus/security/advisories/GHSA-8p72-rcq4-h6pw"
},
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-39699"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://github.com/directus/directus/commit/d577b44231c0923aca99cac5770fd853801caee1"
},
{
"type": "PACKAGE",
"url": "https://github.com/directus/directus"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": [
{
"score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N",
"type": "CVSS_V3"
},
{
"score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:N/SA:N",
"type": "CVSS_V4"
}
],
"summary": "Directus Blind SSRF On File Import"
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.