ghsa-8qf7-26p9-j472
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-13 01:23
Modified
2022-05-13 01:23
Severity ?
Details
libseccomp before 2.4.0 did not correctly generate 64-bit syscall argument comparisons using the arithmetic operators (LT, GT, LE, GE), which might able to lead to bypassing seccomp filters and potential privilege escalations.
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2019-9893", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2019-03-21T16:01:00Z", severity: "CRITICAL", }, details: "libseccomp before 2.4.0 did not correctly generate 64-bit syscall argument comparisons using the arithmetic operators (LT, GT, LE, GE), which might able to lead to bypassing seccomp filters and potential privilege escalations.", id: "GHSA-8qf7-26p9-j472", modified: "2022-05-13T01:23:07Z", published: "2022-05-13T01:23:07Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2019-9893", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://github.com/seccomp/libseccomp/issues/139", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:3624", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://seclists.org/oss-sec/2019/q1/179", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201904-18", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://usn.ubuntu.com/4001-1", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://usn.ubuntu.com/4001-2", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-10/msg00022.html", }, { type: "WEB", url: "http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-security-announce/2019-10/msg00027.html", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [ { score: "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", type: "CVSS_V3", }, ], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.