GHSA-8R98-2JRH-G328
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-17 01:59 – Updated: 2025-04-11 03:46
VLAI
Details
Multiple SQL injection vulnerabilities in WEC Discussion Forum (wec_discussion) extension 2.1.0 and earlier for TYPO3 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via unspecified vectors, as exploited in the wild in April 2011.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2011-1722"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [
"CWE-89"
],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2011-04-19T19:55:00Z",
"severity": "HIGH"
},
"details": "Multiple SQL injection vulnerabilities in WEC Discussion Forum (wec_discussion) extension 2.1.0 and earlier for TYPO3 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via unspecified vectors, as exploited in the wild in April 2011.",
"id": "GHSA-8r98-2jrh-g328",
"modified": "2025-04-11T03:46:09Z",
"published": "2022-05-17T01:59:37Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2011-1722"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/66619"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://osvdb.org/71674"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/44055"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://typo3.org/extensions/repository/view/wec_discussion/2.1.1"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://typo3.org/teams/security/security-bulletins/typo3-sa-2011-003"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/47257"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "http://www.vupen.com/english/advisories/2011/0896"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Experimental. This forecast is provided for visualization only and may change without notice. Do not use it for operational decisions.
Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…