ghsa-8rq5-cphq-cc83
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-13 01:44
Modified
2022-05-13 01:44
Details

In Netwide Assembler (NASM) 2.14rc0, there is a heap-based buffer over-read in the function detoken() in asm/preproc.c that will cause a remote denial of service attack.

Show details on source website


{
   affected: [],
   aliases: [
      "CVE-2017-17812",
   ],
   database_specific: {
      cwe_ids: [
         "CWE-125",
      ],
      github_reviewed: false,
      github_reviewed_at: null,
      nvd_published_at: "2017-12-21T03:29:00Z",
      severity: "MODERATE",
   },
   details: "In Netwide Assembler (NASM) 2.14rc0, there is a heap-based buffer over-read in the function detoken() in asm/preproc.c that will cause a remote denial of service attack.",
   id: "GHSA-8rq5-cphq-cc83",
   modified: "2022-05-13T01:44:29Z",
   published: "2022-05-13T01:44:29Z",
   references: [
      {
         type: "ADVISORY",
         url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2017-17812",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://bugzilla.nasm.us/show_bug.cgi?id=3392424",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "https://usn.ubuntu.com/3694-1",
      },
      {
         type: "WEB",
         url: "http://repo.or.cz/nasm.git/commit/9b7ee09abfd426b99aa1ea81d19a3b2818eeabf9",
      },
   ],
   schema_version: "1.4.0",
   severity: [
      {
         score: "CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
         type: "CVSS_V3",
      },
   ],
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.

Security Advisory comment format.

This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.

UUIDv4 of the comment
UUIDv4 of the Vulnerability-Lookup instance
When the comment was created originally
When the comment was last updated
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
The identifier of the vulnerability (CVE ID, GHSA-ID, PYSEC ID, etc.).



Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.