ghsa-8xg7-956h-4q23
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-05-13 01:48
Modified
2022-05-13 01:48
Severity ?
Details
GNOME librsvg version before commit c6ddf2ed4d768fd88adbea2b63f575cd523022ea contains a Improper input validation vulnerability in rsvg-io.c that can result in the victim's Windows username and NTLM password hash being leaked to remote attackers through SMB. This attack appear to be exploitable via The victim must process a specially crafted SVG file containing an UNC path on Windows.
{ affected: [], aliases: [ "CVE-2018-1000041", ], database_specific: { cwe_ids: [], github_reviewed: false, github_reviewed_at: null, nvd_published_at: "2018-02-09T23:29:00Z", severity: "HIGH", }, details: "GNOME librsvg version before commit c6ddf2ed4d768fd88adbea2b63f575cd523022ea contains a Improper input validation vulnerability in rsvg-io.c that can result in the victim's Windows username and NTLM password hash being leaked to remote attackers through SMB. This attack appear to be exploitable via The victim must process a specially crafted SVG file containing an UNC path on Windows.", id: "GHSA-8xg7-956h-4q23", modified: "2022-05-13T01:48:30Z", published: "2022-05-13T01:48:30Z", references: [ { type: "ADVISORY", url: "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2018-1000041", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://github.com/GNOME/librsvg/commit/c6ddf2ed4d768fd88adbea2b63f575cd523022ea", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://github.com/ImageMagick/librsvg/commit/f9d69eadd2b16b00d1a1f9f286122123f8e547dd", }, { type: "WEB", url: "https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2018/02/msg00013.html", }, ], schema_version: "1.4.0", severity: [ { score: "CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H", type: "CVSS_V3", }, ], }
Log in or create an account to share your comment.
Security Advisory comment format.
This schema specifies the format of a comment related to a security advisory.
Title of the comment
Description of the comment
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
Author | Source | Type | Date |
---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
- Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.