GHSA-9349-MW6P-6HQH

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-01 17:53 – Updated: 2022-05-01 17:53
VLAI?
Details

Unspecified vulnerability in LedgerSMB before 1.1.5 and SQL-Ledger before 2.6.25 allows remote attackers to overwrite files and possibly bypass authentication, and remote authenticated users to execute unauthorized code, by calling a custom error function that returns from execution.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2007-1437"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2007-03-13T19:19:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Unspecified vulnerability in LedgerSMB before 1.1.5 and SQL-Ledger before 2.6.25 allows remote attackers to overwrite files and possibly bypass authentication, and remote authenticated users to execute unauthorized code, by calling a custom error function that returns from execution.",
  "id": "GHSA-9349-mw6p-6hqh",
  "modified": "2022-05-01T17:53:47Z",
  "published": "2022-05-01T17:53:47Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2007-1437"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/24363"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://secunia.com/advisories/24366"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://securityreason.com/securityalert/2435"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/461944/100/100/threaded"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…