GHSA-93WM-FH6P-4CPF

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2022-05-24 19:04 – Updated: 2022-05-24 19:04
VLAI?
Details

Multiple storage XSS vulnerabilities were discovered on BF-430, BF-431 and BF-450M TCP/IP Converter devices from CHIYU Technology Inc due to a lack of sanitization of the input on the components man.cgi, if.cgi, dhcpc.cgi, ppp.cgi.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2021-31250"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-79"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2021-06-04T21:15:00Z",
    "severity": "MODERATE"
  },
  "details": "Multiple storage XSS vulnerabilities were discovered on BF-430, BF-431 and BF-450M TCP/IP Converter devices from CHIYU Technology Inc due to a lack of sanitization of the input on the components man.cgi, if.cgi, dhcpc.cgi, ppp.cgi.",
  "id": "GHSA-93wm-fh6p-4cpf",
  "modified": "2022-05-24T19:04:00Z",
  "published": "2022-05-24T19:04:00Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-31250"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://gitbook.seguranca-informatica.pt/cve-and-exploits/cves/chiyu-iot-devices#cve-2021-31250"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://seguranca-informatica.pt/dancing-in-the-iot-chiyu-devices-vulnerable-to-remote-attacks"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://www.chiyu-tech.com/msg/message-Firmware-update-87.htm"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.


Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…