GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GHSA-9478-77XP-CR7G

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-11 21:31 – Updated: 2026-09-14 15:32
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

libceph: validate OSD extent maps before cursor advance

net/ceph/osd_client.c:osd_sparse_read() validates that the sparse-read data length matches the summed extent lengths, but it does not validate that each OSD-supplied extent is monotonic and lies inside the original request range. A malformed authenticated OSD reply can advertise a far-forward nonzero extent offset with a matching data length and make the client advance the message-data cursor beyond the request buffer. This reaches the BUG_ON(!*length) assertion in ceph_msg_data_next() from the client receive path.

Impact: A malicious or compromised authenticated Ceph OSD peer can crash a kernel Ceph client via a malformed sparse-read reply.

Reject sparse extent maps that overflow, move backwards, overlap, or extend outside the original sparse-read request before advancing the cursor.

[ idryomov: perform sparse_extent_map_valid() check a bit earlier, in CEPH_SPARSE_READ_DATA_LEN instead of CEPH_SPARSE_READ_DATA_PRE state ]

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2026-89657"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2026-09-11T20:19:51Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nlibceph: validate OSD extent maps before cursor advance\n\nnet/ceph/osd_client.c:osd_sparse_read() validates that the sparse-read\ndata length matches the summed extent lengths, but it does not validate\nthat each OSD-supplied extent is monotonic and lies inside the original\nrequest range. A malformed authenticated OSD reply can advertise a\nfar-forward nonzero extent offset with a matching data length and make\nthe client advance the message-data cursor beyond the request buffer.\nThis reaches the BUG_ON(!*length) assertion in ceph_msg_data_next() from\nthe client receive path.\n\nImpact: A malicious or compromised authenticated Ceph OSD peer can crash\na kernel Ceph client via a malformed sparse-read reply.\n\nReject sparse extent maps that overflow, move backwards, overlap, or\nextend outside the original sparse-read request before advancing the\ncursor.\n\n[ idryomov: perform sparse_extent_map_valid() check a bit earlier,\n  in CEPH_SPARSE_READ_DATA_LEN instead of CEPH_SPARSE_READ_DATA_PRE\n  state ]",
  "id": "GHSA-9478-77xp-cr7g",
  "modified": "2026-09-14T15:32:33Z",
  "published": "2026-09-11T21:31:35Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-89657"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/058ffa81f9440c5b4714685611cf697fd3739ec9"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/201db408872ca12cf09e36bf0f560138c3dcfa1c"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2571b35883268a266554e80d368e67fdfea7fb9d"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/94ae5145c520618802b0a24c047dcd5f05835db8"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/9ec08b7499a62c6d4afa93d36ab47a43fcad57d1"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…