GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GHSA-95F3-H98W-WW8W

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-04-09 21:31 – Updated: 2025-04-15 21:31
VLAI
Details

An Improper Following of Specification by Caller vulnerability in web management (J-Web, Captive Portal, 802.1X, Juniper Secure Connect (JSC) of Juniper Networks Junos OS on SRX Series, EX Series, MX240, MX480, MX960, QFX5120 Series, allows an unauthenticated, network-based attacker, sending genuine traffic targeted to the device to cause the CPU to climb until the device becomes unresponsive.

Continuous receipt of these packets will create a sustained Denial of Service (DoS) condition.

This issue affects Junos OS: 

  • All versions before 21.4R3-S9,
  • from 22.2 before 22.2R3-S5,
  • from 22.4 before 22.4R3-S4,
  • from 23.2 before 23.2R2-S3,
  • from 23.4 before 23.4R2-S3,
  • from 24.2 before 24.2R1-S1, 24.2R2.

An indicator of compromise is to review the CPU % of the httpd process in the CLI: e.g.   show system processes extensive | match httpd  PID nobody       52   0   20M    191M select   2   0:01   80.00% httpd{httpd} <<<<< the percentage of httpd usage if high may be an indicator

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2025-21601"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-573"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-04-09T20:15:26Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "An Improper Following of Specification by Caller vulnerability in web management (J-Web, Captive Portal, 802.1X, Juniper Secure Connect (JSC) of\u00a0Juniper Networks Junos OS on SRX Series, EX Series, MX240, MX480, MX960, QFX5120 Series, allows an\u00a0unauthenticated, network-based attacker, sending genuine traffic targeted to the device to cause the CPU to climb until the device becomes unresponsive. \n\nContinuous receipt of these packets will create a sustained Denial of Service (DoS) condition.\n\n\n\n\nThis issue affects Junos OS:\u00a0\n\n\n\n  *  All versions before 21.4R3-S9,\n  *  from 22.2 before 22.2R3-S5,\n  *  from 22.4 before 22.4R3-S4,\n  *  from 23.2 before 23.2R2-S3,\n  *  from 23.4 before 23.4R2-S3,\n  *  from 24.2 before 24.2R1-S1, 24.2R2.\n\n\nAn indicator of compromise is to review the CPU % of the httpd process in the CLI:\ne.g.\n\u00a0\u00a0show system processes extensive | match httpd\u00a0 PID nobody \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 52  \u00a0 0  \u00a0 20M\u00a0 \u00a0 191M select \u00a0 2 \u00a0 0:01 \u00a0 80.00% httpd{httpd} \u003c\u003c\u003c\u003c\u003c the percentage of httpd usage if high may be an indicator",
  "id": "GHSA-95f3-h98w-ww8w",
  "modified": "2025-04-15T21:31:32Z",
  "published": "2025-04-09T21:31:43Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-21601"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://supportportal.juniper.net/JSA96452"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    },
    {
      "score": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:Y/R:A/V:C/RE:M/U:Amber",
      "type": "CVSS_V4"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…