GHSA-97PV-PQPM-W4FG
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2026-09-09 18:32 – Updated: 2026-09-09 18:32In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/amdgpu: fix recursive ww_mutex acquire in amdgpu_devcoredump_format
When dumping IB contents from a hung job, amdgpu_devcoredump_format() acquired the VM root PD's reservation via amdgpu_vm_lock_by_pasid() and then, for each IB, called amdgpu_bo_reserve() on the BO backing the IB. Both reservations are reservation_ww_class_mutex objects and neither used a ww_acquire_ctx, which trips lockdep:
WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
kworker/u128:0 is trying to acquire lock: ffff88838b16e1f0 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: amdgpu_devcoredump_format+0x1594/0x23f0 [amdgpu]
but task is already holding lock: ffff8882f82681f0 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: amdgpu_devcoredump_format+0x1594/0x23f0 [amdgpu]
Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 ---- lock(reservation_ww_class_mutex); lock(reservation_ww_class_mutex);
*** DEADLOCK *** May be due to missing lock nesting notation
Workqueue: events_unbound amdgpu_devcoredump_deferred_work [amdgpu] Call Trace: __ww_mutex_lock.constprop.0 ww_mutex_lock amdgpu_bo_reserve amdgpu_devcoredump_format+0x1594 [amdgpu] amdgpu_devcoredump_deferred_work+0xea [amdgpu]
The two reservations are on different BOs in the captured trace, so the splat is a lockdep-correctness warning, not an observed deadlock. It becomes a real self-deadlock whenever the IB BO shares its dma_resv with the root PD (the always-valid case, see amdgpu_vm_is_bo_always_valid()): amdgpu_bo_reserve(abo) re-acquires the same ww_mutex without a ticket and blocks forever. With amdgpu.gpu_recovery=0 the timeout handler refires every ~2 s and each invocation produces this splat, drowning the kernel ring buffer.
Now that amdgpu_vm_lock_by_pasid() takes a drm_exec context, move the IB dumping into a separate helper that locks the root PD and every IB BO together in a single drm_exec ticket. DRM_EXEC_IGNORE_DUPLICATES handles IB BOs that share a dma_resv (e.g. always-valid BOs, or two IBs backed by the same BO). Every lock is now a top-level acquire under one ww_acquire_ctx, so the recursive ww_mutex condition is gone, and the per-IB amdgpu_bo_reserve()/amdgpu_bo_unref() dance -- including a BO refcount leak on the amdgpu_bo_reserve() failure path -- is removed.
(cherry picked from commit d6bf4242731219ee08ce54c365631e395486651e)
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2026-80919"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2026-09-09T17:17:47Z",
"severity": null
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\ndrm/amdgpu: fix recursive ww_mutex acquire in amdgpu_devcoredump_format\n\nWhen dumping IB contents from a hung job, amdgpu_devcoredump_format()\nacquired the VM root PD\u0027s reservation via amdgpu_vm_lock_by_pasid() and\nthen, for each IB, called amdgpu_bo_reserve() on the BO backing the IB.\nBoth reservations are reservation_ww_class_mutex objects and neither\nused a ww_acquire_ctx, which trips lockdep:\n\n WARNING: possible recursive locking detected\n --------------------------------------------\n kworker/u128:0 is trying to acquire lock:\n ffff88838b16e1f0 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4},\n at: amdgpu_devcoredump_format+0x1594/0x23f0 [amdgpu]\n\n but task is already holding lock:\n ffff8882f82681f0 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4},\n at: amdgpu_devcoredump_format+0x1594/0x23f0 [amdgpu]\n\n Possible unsafe locking scenario:\n CPU0\n ----\n lock(reservation_ww_class_mutex);\n lock(reservation_ww_class_mutex);\n\n *** DEADLOCK ***\n May be due to missing lock nesting notation\n\n Workqueue: events_unbound amdgpu_devcoredump_deferred_work [amdgpu]\n Call Trace:\n __ww_mutex_lock.constprop.0\n ww_mutex_lock\n amdgpu_bo_reserve\n amdgpu_devcoredump_format+0x1594 [amdgpu]\n amdgpu_devcoredump_deferred_work+0xea [amdgpu]\n\nThe two reservations are on different BOs in the captured trace, so the\nsplat is a lockdep-correctness warning, not an observed deadlock. It\nbecomes a real self-deadlock whenever the IB BO shares its dma_resv with\nthe root PD (the always-valid case, see amdgpu_vm_is_bo_always_valid()):\namdgpu_bo_reserve(abo) re-acquires the same ww_mutex without a ticket\nand blocks forever. With amdgpu.gpu_recovery=0 the timeout handler\nrefires every ~2 s and each invocation produces this splat, drowning the\nkernel ring buffer.\n\nNow that amdgpu_vm_lock_by_pasid() takes a drm_exec context, move the IB\ndumping into a separate helper that locks the root PD and every IB BO\ntogether in a single drm_exec ticket. DRM_EXEC_IGNORE_DUPLICATES handles\nIB BOs that share a dma_resv (e.g. always-valid BOs, or two IBs backed\nby the same BO). Every lock is now a top-level acquire under one\nww_acquire_ctx, so the recursive ww_mutex condition is gone, and the\nper-IB amdgpu_bo_reserve()/amdgpu_bo_unref() dance -- including a BO\nrefcount leak on the amdgpu_bo_reserve() failure path -- is removed.\n\n(cherry picked from commit d6bf4242731219ee08ce54c365631e395486651e)",
"id": "GHSA-97pv-pqpm-w4fg",
"modified": "2026-09-09T18:32:04Z",
"published": "2026-09-09T18:32:04Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-80919"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4e9b4dee0777ec9c835a4746e2d30382dd9d1044"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7152b248dc3c8d5fa8629e99ed5655dd41b51562"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date | Other |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
The approach is described in our paper Mapping CVEs to MITRE ATT&CK Techniques: A Curated Gold-Set Classifier and the Limits of LLM-Assisted Label Expansion.