ghsa-98x9-358f-pg9v
Vulnerability from github
Published
2022-04-30 18:20
Modified
2022-04-30 18:20
Details

Cisco IOS 12.0 through 12.2, when supporting SSH, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) via a large packet that was designed to exploit the SSH CRC32 attack detection overflow (CVE-2001-0144).

Show details on source website


{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2002-1024"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2002-10-04T04:00:00Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "Cisco IOS 12.0 through 12.2, when supporting SSH, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) via a large packet that was designed to exploit the SSH CRC32 attack detection overflow (CVE-2001-0144).",
  "id": "GHSA-98x9-358f-pg9v",
  "modified": "2022-04-30T18:20:24Z",
  "published": "2022-04-30T18:20:24Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2002-1024"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/707/SSH-scanning.shtml"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.iss.net/security_center/static/9437.php"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/290140"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/5114"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": []
}


Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading...

Loading...

Loading...

Sightings

Author Source Type Date

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or seen somewhere by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability is confirmed from an analyst perspective.
  • Exploited: This vulnerability was exploited and seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Patched: This vulnerability was successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not exploited: This vulnerability was not exploited or seen by the user reporting the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expresses doubt about the veracity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: This vulnerability was not successfully patched by the user reporting the sighting.