GCVE Workshop - 22 September 2026 (14:00-18:00), Luxembourg Before The Vulnopticon Conference - Registration

GHSA-9925-237C-WGF7

Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-02-27 21:32 – Updated: 2025-02-27 21:32
VLAI
Details

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

ASoC: rt5645: Fix errorenous cleanup order

There is a logic error when removing rt5645 device as the function rt5645_i2c_remove() first cancel the &rt5645->jack_detect_work and delete the &rt5645->btn_check_timer latter. However, since the timer handler rt5645_btn_check_callback() will re-queue the jack_detect_work, this cleanup order is buggy.

That is, once the del_timer_sync in rt5645_i2c_remove is concurrently run with the rt5645_btn_check_callback, the canceled jack_detect_work will be rescheduled again, leading to possible use-after-free.

This patch fix the issue by placing the del_timer_sync function before the cancel_delayed_work_sync.

Show details on source website

{
  "affected": [],
  "aliases": [
    "CVE-2022-49493"
  ],
  "database_specific": {
    "cwe_ids": [
      "CWE-416"
    ],
    "github_reviewed": false,
    "github_reviewed_at": null,
    "nvd_published_at": "2025-02-26T07:01:25Z",
    "severity": "HIGH"
  },
  "details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nASoC: rt5645: Fix errorenous cleanup order\n\nThere is a logic error when removing rt5645 device as the function\nrt5645_i2c_remove() first cancel the \u0026rt5645-\u003ejack_detect_work and\ndelete the \u0026rt5645-\u003ebtn_check_timer latter. However, since the timer\nhandler rt5645_btn_check_callback() will re-queue the jack_detect_work,\nthis cleanup order is buggy.\n\nThat is, once the del_timer_sync in rt5645_i2c_remove is concurrently\nrun with the rt5645_btn_check_callback, the canceled jack_detect_work\nwill be rescheduled again, leading to possible use-after-free.\n\nThis patch fix the issue by placing the del_timer_sync function before\nthe cancel_delayed_work_sync.",
  "id": "GHSA-9925-237c-wgf7",
  "modified": "2025-02-27T21:32:14Z",
  "published": "2025-02-27T21:32:14Z",
  "references": [
    {
      "type": "ADVISORY",
      "url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-49493"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/061a6159cea583f1155f67d1915917a6b9282662"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/0941150100173d4eaf3fe08ff4b16740e7c3026f"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1a5a3dfd9f172dcb115072f0aea5e27d3083c20e"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/236d29c5857f02e0a53fdf15d3dce1536c4322ce"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2def44d3aec59e38d2701c568d65540783f90f2f"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/453f0920ffc1a28e28ddb9c3cd5562472b2895b0"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/7d801e807536a9a9c2146c5f4a5836f154517ed3"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/88c09e4812d72c3153afc8e5a45ecac2d0eae3ff"
    },
    {
      "type": "WEB",
      "url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/abe7554da62cb489712a54de69ef5665c250e564"
    }
  ],
  "schema_version": "1.4.0",
  "severity": [
    {
      "score": "CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H",
      "type": "CVSS_V3"
    }
  ]
}



Log in or create an account to share your comment.




Tags
Taxonomy of the tags.


Loading…

Loading…

Loading…

Forecast uses a logistic model when the trend is rising, or an exponential decay model when the trend is falling. Fitted via linearized least squares.

Sightings

Author Source Type Date Other

Nomenclature

  • Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
  • Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
  • Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
  • Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
  • Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
  • Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.

Loading…

Detection rules are retrieved from Rulezet.

Loading…

Loading…

Related by attack behaviour

Vulnerabilities whose description is nearest to this one in the vector space of the CIRCL/vulnerability-attack-technique-biencoder model. This is a similarity search over the bi-encoder space (plain cosine), not a classification, and it has no measured accuracy.


Loading…