GHSA-99PP-V74J-JMGV
Vulnerability from github – Published: 2025-12-24 15:30 – Updated: 2025-12-24 15:30
VLAI?
Details
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
bpf: Free special fields when update [lru_,]percpu_hash maps
As [lru_,]percpu_hash maps support BPF_KPTR_{REF,PERCPU}, missing calls to 'bpf_obj_free_fields()' in 'pcpu_copy_value()' could cause the memory referenced by BPF_KPTR_{REF,PERCPU} fields to be held until the map gets freed.
Fix this by calling 'bpf_obj_free_fields()' after 'copy_map_value,_long' in 'pcpu_copy_value()'.
{
"affected": [],
"aliases": [
"CVE-2025-68744"
],
"database_specific": {
"cwe_ids": [],
"github_reviewed": false,
"github_reviewed_at": null,
"nvd_published_at": "2025-12-24T13:16:29Z",
"severity": null
},
"details": "In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:\n\nbpf: Free special fields when update [lru_,]percpu_hash maps\n\nAs [lru_,]percpu_hash maps support BPF_KPTR_{REF,PERCPU}, missing\ncalls to \u0027bpf_obj_free_fields()\u0027 in \u0027pcpu_copy_value()\u0027 could cause the\nmemory referenced by BPF_KPTR_{REF,PERCPU} fields to be held until the\nmap gets freed.\n\nFix this by calling \u0027bpf_obj_free_fields()\u0027 after\n\u0027copy_map_value[,_long]()\u0027 in \u0027pcpu_copy_value()\u0027.",
"id": "GHSA-99pp-v74j-jmgv",
"modified": "2025-12-24T15:30:44Z",
"published": "2025-12-24T15:30:44Z",
"references": [
{
"type": "ADVISORY",
"url": "https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-68744"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3bf1378747e251571e0de15e7e0a6bf2919044e7"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4a03d69cece145e4fb527464be29c3806aa3221e"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6af6e49a76c9af7d42eb923703e7648cb2bf401a"
},
{
"type": "WEB",
"url": "https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/96a5cb7072cabbac5c66ac9318242c3bdceebb68"
}
],
"schema_version": "1.4.0",
"severity": []
}
Loading…
Loading…
Sightings
| Author | Source | Type | Date |
|---|
Nomenclature
- Seen: The vulnerability was mentioned, discussed, or observed by the user.
- Confirmed: The vulnerability has been validated from an analyst's perspective.
- Published Proof of Concept: A public proof of concept is available for this vulnerability.
- Exploited: The vulnerability was observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Patched: The vulnerability was observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not exploited: The vulnerability was not observed as exploited by the user who reported the sighting.
- Not confirmed: The user expressed doubt about the validity of the vulnerability.
- Not patched: The vulnerability was not observed as successfully patched by the user who reported the sighting.
Loading…
Loading…